E-ISSN 2367-699X | ISSN 2367-7414
 

Original Research

Online Publishing Date:
26 / 03 / 2023

 


Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis

Shailendra Pal Singh, Ravi Shankar, Mradul Bansal, Nitish Jain.


Abstract
Introduction:
Intra-abdominal pressure is important risk factor for predicting mortality and morbidity in the early phase of acute pancreatitis. World Society on the abdominal compartment syndrome defines Intra-abdominal hypertension as a sustained increase in pressure above 12 mm of Hg and abdominal compartment syndrome is a sustained increase in intra-abdominal pressure above 20 mm of Hg with new onset organ failure. However, even values of lower than 15 mm of Hg may cause organ dysfunction.
Material and Methods:
Intra-abdominal pressure was indirectly determined by measuring urinary bladder pressure with a 16 gauge Foley’s catheter in situ. The bladder was drained completely and the tubing of the collecting bag was clamped and then the catheter will be connected to a saline manometer. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured on day 1st, 3rd, 7th and 14th after controlling the severe pain by analgesics.
Result:
In our study 50 patient of acute pancreatitis was taken. Patient was categorized in low risk and high risk group according to Ranson’s, APACHE and IAP criteria. It was observed that there is a positive correlation between IAP with APACHE and Ranson’s score, positive predictive value for assessment of mortality (4%), Ranson’s (4%), APACHE scoring (4%). It was observed that as the grade of Ranson’s and APACHE increases in patients of acute pancreatitis, IAP also increases. Similarly for morbidity most of the local complication occurs in moderate to severe grade of IAP 1st day (>15 mm), severe grade of APACHE score (>13) and severe grade of Ranson’s score (>3). Common systemic complication were gastrointestinal (98%), circulatory (52%), respiratory (68%), metabolic (56%), renal (24%), MODS (10%), ARDS (8%), DIC (4%). Most of the systemic complication occurs in moderate to severe grade of IAP 1st day (>15), severe grade of APACHE score (>8) and severe grade of Ranson’s score (>3).
Conclusion:
IAP measurement is cheap, easy, bedside, minimally invasive prognostic modality, cheaper alternative to Ranson’s and APACHE scoring. Early IAP monitoring can be very useful in assessment of mild to severe acute pancreatitis, hospital stay, determines local and systemic complication.

Key words: Acute Pancreatitis, APACHE, Ranson, Intra-abdominal Pressure


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Shailendra Pal Singh
Articles by Ravi Shankar
Articles by Mradul Bansal
Articles by Nitish Jain
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Singh SP, Shankar R, Bansal M, Jain N, . Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis. Int J Surg Med. 2023; 9(1): 27-31. doi:10.5455/ijsm.136-1666724981


Web Style

Singh SP, Shankar R, Bansal M, Jain N, . Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis. https://www.ejos.org/?mno=124534 [Access: February 20, 2024]. doi:10.5455/ijsm.136-1666724981


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Singh SP, Shankar R, Bansal M, Jain N, . Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis. Int J Surg Med. 2023; 9(1): 27-31. doi:10.5455/ijsm.136-1666724981



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Singh SP, Shankar R, Bansal M, Jain N, . Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis. Int J Surg Med. (2023), [cited February 20, 2024]; 9(1): 27-31. doi:10.5455/ijsm.136-1666724981



Harvard Style

Singh, S. P., Shankar, R., Bansal, M., Jain, N. & (2023) Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis. Int J Surg Med, 9 (1), 27-31. doi:10.5455/ijsm.136-1666724981



Turabian Style

Singh, Shailendra Pal, Ravi Shankar, Mradul Bansal, Nitish Jain, and . 2023. Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis. International Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 9 (1), 27-31. doi:10.5455/ijsm.136-1666724981



Chicago Style

Singh, Shailendra Pal, Ravi Shankar, Mradul Bansal, Nitish Jain, and . "Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis." International Journal of Surgery and Medicine 9 (2023), 27-31. doi:10.5455/ijsm.136-1666724981



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Singh, Shailendra Pal, Ravi Shankar, Mradul Bansal, Nitish Jain, and . "Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis." International Journal of Surgery and Medicine 9.1 (2023), 27-31. Print. doi:10.5455/ijsm.136-1666724981



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Singh, S. P., Shankar, R., Bansal, M., Jain, N. & (2023) Comparison of Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring vs APACHE-II and Ranson’s scoring in predicting the outcome of Acute Pancreatitis. International Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 9 (1), 27-31. doi:10.5455/ijsm.136-1666724981